The potential harm posed by blue light from digital devices like smartphones, laptops, and tablets has long been a subject of scientific inquiry, with concerns about its impact on human health, particularly regarding disruptions to circadian rhythm, the internal biological clock responsible for the regulation of body functions based on one's wake/sleep cycle.    

However, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has highlighted the lack of consensus among public health officials regarding the effects of short wavelength light (SWL) from artificial sources.

Is Blue Light Harmful to Human Health?

In their comprehensive statement featured in the April issue of Health Physics, ICNIRP delves into the conflicting research findings surrounding SWL exposure and its physiological effects, Medical Xpress reported.

The neuroendocrine system and circadian rhythms are sensitive to SWL, encompassing light in the wavelength range of 380 to 550 nanometers. This light can potentially reduce evening sleepiness, suppress melatonin levels, and influence sleep quality and duration, which could affect long-term health outcomes.

However, the evidence from experimental studies on the effects of SWL exposure is inconsistent, according to the ICNIRP panel. While some studies suggest possible effects on alertness or sleep, others do not support such conclusions. 

The variability in study outcomes may be attributed to differences in light intensity, wavelengths, duration, timing, and participant demographics, among other factors.

Moreover, the panel acknowledges the uncertainty surrounding the long-term adverse effects of SWL exposure. While insufficient sleep, including sleep deficit due to circadian disruption, has been linked to cognitive impairments, mood disorders, and other health issues, the direct impact of SWL on these outcomes remains unclear. 

Read Also: How to Protect Your Eyes From Too Much Screen Time-Blue Light Effect, Safety Habits, MORE!

Absence of Conclusive Evidence

Most studies assessing circadian disruption have focused on shift workers, but these populations lack direct measurements of light exposure.

ICNIRP emphasizes the need for further research to address data gaps and determine the types of studies, parameters, and methodologies necessary to accurately assess the potential health risks associated with SWL exposure. 

Without conclusive evidence, ICNIRP recommends improving the quality of future studies and supporting measures to mitigate potential risks.

The ICNIRP statement underscores the complexity of understanding the effects of SWL on human health and the importance of rigorous scientific inquiry to inform evidence-based guidelines. As technology advances, addressing the implications of blue light exposure remains a critical area of research and public health concern.

"ICNIRP recommends that an analysis of data gaps be performed to delineate the types of studies needed, the parameters that should be addressed, and the methodology that should be applied in future studies so that a decision about the need for exposure guidelines can be made. In the meantime, ICNIRP supports some recommendations for how the quality of future studies might be improved," the panel's statement read. 

Related Article: Blue Light is Dangerous Says Experts-Here's How to Protect Yourself