Bill Gates Warns COP30 Leaders Are 'Wasting Billions' on Climate Panic Instead of Saving Lives

In a 17-page memo released ahead of COP30, Gates criticises the focus on emissions targets, urging leaders to prioritise human welfare and address poverty and disease as part of the climate response.

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates announced plans to significantly accelerate the Gates Foundation's spending, meaning the organization will shut down in 2045

Bill Gates has called for a fundamental re-evaluation of the global response to climate change. He warns that an overly alarmist narrative is distracting from more effective interventions aimed at improving human welfare, particularly in the world's poorest countries.

A Shift in Priorities Ahead of COP30

In a 17-page memorandum published on Tuesday, coinciding with his 70th birthday, the Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist criticised what he described as a 'doomsday view of climate change.' He argued this perspective has led policymakers to focus excessively on near-term emissions reduction goals, at the expense of broader human development concerns.

'Although climate change will have serious consequences—particularly for people in the poorest countries—it will not lead to humanity's demise,' Gates wrote. He urged a shift from prioritising strict temperature limits to addressing the real suffering caused by poverty, disease, and environmental hardship in the most vulnerable populations.

The memorandum arrives just two weeks before COP30 begins in Belém, Brazil, scheduled for 10-21 November. Gates has called on delegates to the United Nations climate meeting to reconsider whether the limited funds allocated for climate initiatives are being directed toward the most impactful priorities.

Development as Climate Adaptation

Central to Gates's argument is the view that climate change, disease, and poverty should be tackled proportionally to their impact on human suffering. He highlighted that health issues related to poverty—such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, diarrhoeal diseases, and childbirth complications—cause approximately 8 million deaths annually. In contrast, extreme heat currently results in around 500,000 deaths per year.

When asked whether he would accept a slight increase in global temperatures to eradicate malaria, Gates told reporters, 'I'll let the temperature go up 0.1 degree to get rid of malaria.'

He also cited economic research suggesting that development itself acts as a form of climate adaptation. Data from the University of Chicago's Climate Impact Lab shows that projected deaths from climate-related causes decline by more than 50 per cent when accounting for economic growth in low-income countries over the coming decades.

Evolving Climate Messaging

This memo marks a notable shift in Gates's public stance. Four years ago, he published How to Avoid a Climate Disaster, outlining an ambitious plan to reduce emissions. Since 2015, he has invested billions through his climate-focused venture fund, Breakthrough Energy.

Gates emphasises he is not calling for reduced climate investment but advocates for reallocating resources toward interventions with the greatest impact on human welfare. The Gates Foundation, which has committed tens of billions of dollars to healthcare, education, and development projects worldwide, continues efforts to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria in developing nations.

Debate Resurfaces Amid Aid Cuts

The timing of the memo is significant, given recent cuts to international aid. The Trump administration's closure of USAID, which provided around $8 billion annually for health and food security programmes, exemplifies this trend. Gates's call to redirect climate funds towards poverty and disease interventions comes at a critical juncture, with traditional aid budgets shrinking and potentially leaving a funding gap for vital global health initiatives.

As world leaders prepare for the COP30 summit, Gates's intervention has reignited the debate over whether combating climate change and alleviating poverty are competing priorities or can be pursued simultaneously to secure a sustainable future for the most vulnerable populations.

Originally published on IBTimes UK

© Copyright IBTimes 2025. All rights reserved.

Join the Discussion