The Florida "Deplatforming" Law backed by Governor Ron De Santis faced a halt from an injunction that was posted by a Federal Judge. This gave Facebook and Twitter a pass from paying $250,000 per day, on the politicians who have taken off their platforms, based on violating the Community Guidelines and other offenses. 

One of the most prolific de-platforming was on former President Donald Trump's case, where Twitter permanently banned him off the short word social media following the change of the POTUS. Shortly, Facebook followed but was initially unclear of what Trump's sentence would be, but then gave him the max 2 years of suspension in the platform. 

Florida Deplatforming Law Gets Injunction

Florida Deplatforming Law Faces Injuction and Halt
(Photo : Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: (L-R) U.S. President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis depart after President Trump signed executive orders on prescription drug prices in the South Court Auditorium at the White House on July 24, 2020 in Washington, DC. President Trump signed a series of four executive orders aimed at lowering prices that for prescription drugs in the United States.

In the recent development of the Florida Deplatforming Law, US District Judge Robert Hinkle has brought up a preliminary injunction against the new law that protects politicians from getting their platforms away from them. 

Free speech is also applied for the big tech companies of Facebook and Twitter, hence the injunction that was posted, and it helped them to be saved from Florida's recently passed law. According to the injunction, Hinkle wrote that they have the right to govern over the platforms, and choose who can stay or be suspended from it, if it violates their guidelines. 

Read Also: DOJ Leaves Apple With No Choice But to Release Private Data Amid Trump's Leaker Crusade

Injunctions cannot fully invalidate a law, rather they can only halt a certain prohibition's effects or rule over something while having it reviewed and reconsidered by courts. 

First Amendment and Deplatforming

The First Amendment of the US Constitution upholds the exercise of free speech for all American citizens, focusing on public speech and via platforms for the modern age. And while deplatforming a politician "violates" free speech, Judge Hinkle argued that free speech can also be exercised by the removal of those who violated certain guidelines. 

Community Guidelines from Facebook or Twitter, and other social media are there to ensure that people would be responsible for carrying out their free speech on social media. As long as it is not inciting violence, or disrespecting any person of any age, race, religion, and ethnicity, it is allowed on the platform. 

This part is the grey area, where both are considered forms of free speech, and both are also in conflict with one another. 

Facebook and Twitter Are Fine-Free

Florida was supposed to be penalizing Facebook and Twitter for banning politicians like Donald Trump for $250,000 per day, making this a very expensive one to pay. However, thanks to the federal judge's injunction, they are fine-free and saved from this.

Twitter's permanent ban would surely cost them a lot, especially as they exhibit no plans of taking it back for Trump.  

Related Article: Facebook Antitrust Law Complaints Thrown Out by US Judge - What Happens Next?

This article is owned by Tech Times

Written by Isaiah Richard

ⓒ 2024 TECHTIMES.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Join the Discussion